Exposing Regulatory Agencies

When individuals put your children in harm’s way for profit,
pleasure or convenience,
it is time to stand together.

• “What if, instead of spending their entire budgets developing profitable pharmaceutical products, Dr. Fauci and the heads of other NIH institutes deployed researchers to explore the links between glyphosate in food and the explosion of gluten allergies, the link between pesticide residues and the epidemic of neurological diseases and cancers, the causal connections between aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease, between mercury from coal plants and escalating autism rates, and the association of airborne particulates with the asthma epidemic?
• What if NIH financed research to explore the association between childhood vaccines and the explosion of juvenile diabetes, asthma, and rheumatoid arthritis, and the links between aluminum vaccine adjuvants and the epidemics of food allergies and allergic rhinitis? What if they studied the impacts of sugar and soft drinks on obesity and diabetes, and the association between endocrine disruptors, processed foods, factory farms, and GMOs on the dramatic decline in public health?
• What would we look like if, for fifty years, we had a public health advocate running one of our top health agencies—instead of a Pharma shill?
• What would have happened if we’d spent that hundreds of billions dollars on real science, instead of drug development? Dr. Fauci seems willing only to give us diagnoses and cures that benefit Big Pharma—instead of public health—and to cover his trail with artifice.

-Robert F Kennedy Jr

Our current campaigns

What to say if you are being forced to Vax:

Healthcare Provider letter

If you are being forced to Vax in order to keep your job, here’s a great way to handle it. The secret is NOT to refuse it…

1.  Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?
2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested
   against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?
3.  Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?
4.  Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?
5.  Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?
6.  Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the
   Nuremberg Code?
7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of
   recovery?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to
accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

1.  You confirm that I will suffer no harm.
2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial
   responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these
   procedures.
3.  In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position
   and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result? I would also advise that my unalienable rights are
   reserved.’

The point being that they CANNOT provide that information but you’ve NOT refused

Myth-Busting

As you know, CHD operate on facts, not conspiracy theories.  So in order for us to take appropriate actions we require facts.  There are a lot of conspiracies out there.  Help us myth-bust or prove the conspiracies please.  We also welcome evidence from government and industry sources to help disprove conspiracies.  You can submit your compelling information (factual, not hearsay or opinion) at contact CHD. The following seem to be major themes at present, can you help validate or bust the conspiracy:

1. Do the Government and regulators really know healthy children are not at risk from Covid?
2. Do the Government and regulators really know that Covid jabs are not safe and effective, especially relative to other jabs, but ignore the policy they previously applied to vaccine harm and precaution?
3. Are there really inadequacies in the Doherty Modelling?
4. Are there really police records on politicians and regulators and the judiciary engaging in paedophilia and if so, why would suppressing such horrific harm to children (and permitting it to continue) be “in the National Interests” as stated by the Federal Attorney General?
5. Is the Government really suppressing the evidence of death or injury to children from the Covid jabs?
6. Is the media really hiding the truth or harm and intentionally suppressing debate on anything but the Government narrative?
7. Are NLP and classic propaganda and psychological techniques really being used by media and government to coerce people into taking the jab?
8. Is the Government really lying about the vaccines being approved when in fact they are experimental genetic therapies, the long term effects of which are completely unknown?
9. Do the Government really know the unvaccinated provide no additional risk in terms of transmission and spread of the virus?
10. Does the Government really know that the virus is no worse than a bad seasonal flu?
11. Is the Government really aware of the disproportionate psychological harm and suffering they are inflicting with their policies?
12. Is there really evidence of conflict of interest, fraud, bribery or intentionally causing harm to children involving parties in Government, regulators and industry?
13. Is there really evidence of a failure of regulatory processes amongst the Health regulators?
14. When politicians and government regulators or other trusted public persons say that the jabs are “safe” and the jabs are “effective” and have undergone “rigorous testing”, are they really intentionally saying this to the public knowing there is no evidence to support their statements, and abundant evidence to suggest otherwise?
15. Do the media and government intentionally collect and report “Death with Covid” as opposed to “Death from Covid” to distort the evidence and create panic in the population?
16. Are the regulators really intentionally altering or manipulating death and injury statistics from vaccines?
17. Is the government really using tax-payer (or industry) money to incentivise the covid death reporting or the administration of jabs?
18. Are there really conflicts of interest amongst political, regulatory or industry decision makers (including their families or family businesses).
19. Are the NDIS, child protection agencies and nursing homes really forcing the administration of PCR tests and jabs?  Do health regulators (including NDIS) really have policies on “physical and chemical restraint to administer the covid vaccines”?
20. Is there really evidence of conspiracy where industry and government and media are working together to increase pharma profits despite knowledge of risk and harm?
21. Is it true that ‘consent’ is not ‘informed consent’ because key evidence needed for a rational person to make a risk assessment before being jabbed is being withheld by the regulators and practitioners?
22. Why are so many medical practitioners leaving or being deregistered by AHPRA for trying to save lives and or fulfilling their legal obligation for mandatory reporting of harm to children?

Corruption EMFs

Dr. Don Maisch, PhD
has been involved in the issue of the health impacts of electromagnetic fields (EMF) since the early 1990’s when he was a science writer for Australian Senator Robert Bell. He has served on government and industry EMF standard setting committees on behalf of the Consumers Federation of Australia. In 2010, he was awarded a PhD from the University of Wollongong for his thesis “The Procrustean Approach” which examines the historical development of the Western radiofrequency/ microwave (RF/MW) exposure standards. His thesis argues that a military industrial complex has long controlled human exposure standards at the expense of objective scientific inquiry and public health protection. This work was recently followed up with a book chapter “Spin In The Antipopdes: A history of industry involvement in telecommunications health research in Australia” (2017). Dr. Maisch has a special interest in promoting research examining possible health impacts from the introduction of new wireless technology, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), 5G and the smart electricity grid. Dr. Maisch has written and published extensively on the health impacts of both power-frequency and RF/MW exposures and maintains a web site: www.emfacts.com